Friday, August 28, 2009

Is VMware scared of something? #Microsoft and #Citrix don't get a big booth? #virtualization

-->
--> --> --> --> Among the hundreds of exhibitors that will be pitching and demoing their virtualization technology at next week's VMware-sponsored VMworld conference, two of them -- Citrix (NSDQ:CTXS) and Microsoft (NSDQ:MSFT) -- will be unusually quiet.

Citrix and Microsoft, archrivals of VMware in the fast-growing virtualization market, are complaining that VMware changed the rules for competitors that wish to participate in the VMworld 2009 conference, to be held in San Francisco.

As a result of those changes, the two have found themselves limited to small 10 x 10-foot booths and shut out of the kind of promotional opportunities offered to exhibitors, which would normally pay extra for larger booths and especially for sponsorship activities.

Things were different at VMworld 2008, held last September in Las Vegas.

At that conference, both Microsoft and Citrix were Gold sponsors, according to the VMworld 2008 Web site.

That is not the case this year, said Kim Woodward, vice president of corporate marketing at Citrix.

"It's a proprietary event," Woodward said. "They get to set the rules. That's fine. We're the kind of company that follows the rules.'...'It's interesting that VMware didn't want to take more of our money for a bigger booth and more participation."

VMware declined to respond to questions about Citrix's and Microsoft's appearances at VMworld 2009.

Woodward said Citrix first learned of the change in April after receiving the VMworld prospectus and then sending a completed contract to event management requesting the same level of participation as in 2008, including being a Gold-level sponsor and exhibiting in what she remembers being a 400-square-foot booth.

The event management responded that, because of new guidelines, Citrix could not participate as a sponsor and could only exhibit in a 100-square-foot booth, Woodward said.

Those guidelines are spelled out on page 2 of the prospectus, a copy of which was examined by Channelweb.com, in a paragraph that reads, "To sponsor or exhibit at VMworld, your company must be a VMware partner in good standing in our TAP, Strategic Global Partner or VIP Partner programs. Sponsors or exhibitors that are not VMware partners may be allowed under exception."

VMware's approach to VMworld is different than Citrix's approach to its primary annual conference, Citrix Synergy, Woodward said.

Citrix Synergy, held in May 2009 and scheduled to be held in May 2010, was already very open, and will be even more so next year, Woodward said. For instance, the judges of papers presented at the conference, who have all been Citrix personnel in the past, will include industry and press participants in the future.

Woodward said Citrix plans no retaliation against VMware at Citrix Synergy 2010.

Next: Microsoft "To Make The Best Of It"

C'mon VMware. Sure in 2008 you were far ahead of Microsoft when it came to virtualization. With the release of Hyper-V R2, not so much. But let's face it, when it comes to the future of Virtualization my take is that there will be a mixed environment. I don't see an entire Hyper-V environment or an entire VMware environment.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

New PS3 Ads - job well done Sony!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Save Thousands Moving to Microsoft #Virtualization @virtualization

REDMOND, Wash., Aug. 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Microsoft Corp. today announced that some business customers are saving on average $170,000 (U.S.) when they switch to Microsoft virtualization software from VMware Inc. software. Customers are turning to Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V and Microsoft System Center management tools to help reduce energy consumption, hardware costs and recurring licensing costs, and improve their overall management of virtual and nonvirtual applications, servers and computers.

(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20000822/MSFTLOGO)

Customers that have switched to Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V, System Center and other Microsoft virtualization solutions include Avanade; Brick Township Board of Education, New Jersey (U.S.); Convergent Computing; Crutchfield Corp.; INA (Croatia); Ingersoll Rand plc; Jackson Energy Authority; Mamut ASA (Norway); the National Concert Hall of Ireland; NetBenefits (U.K.); PoundHost Internet Ltd. (U.K.); Siemens Standard Drives (U.K.); T2 Systems Inc.; Voith IT (Germany); and University of Miami.

Strong customer adoption of server and application virtualization software helped drive growth of the Microsoft System Center suite of management tools. Microsoft recently reported that the company's management division revenues grew more than 30 percent from 2008 to 2009 and is now at approximately $1 billion in annual sales.

Industry consulting firm Information Technology Intelligence Corp. recently published its "2009 Global Virtualization Deployment Trends Survey" of more than 700 IT professionals. The results showed that Microsoft made big year-over-year market share gains across small and midsize businesses and enterprise organizations. The survey showed current use of Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V is 32 percent. The survey also showed that 59 percent of the respondents plan to adopt Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V in the next 12 to 18 months.

"The light switch has gone on for customers, and they realize they no longer have to pay a virtualization tax with VMware that creates an isolated, virtual island within their IT departments," said David Greschler, director of virtualization and management marketing in the Server and Tools Business at Microsoft. "The System Center management suite and Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V provide a cost-effective, interoperable and scalable enterprise-class virtualization solution. As a result, more and more customers are switching to the Microsoft solution, and some are saving on average $170,000 when they switch."

Customers Switch to Microsoft Virtualization

PoundHost is a fast-growing hosting service provider in Maidenhead, England, that embraced server virtualization as a way to curb hardware costs and lower hosting prices. However, the high cost of VMware software and lack of physical management tools hurt PoundHost's competitiveness and ability to manage its entire infrastructure. PoundHost turned to Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V technology to help reduce licensing costs by 80 percent and add new services. With the addition of Microsoft System Center management tools, automated server provisioning has reduced IT costs by more than $50,000 annually. The dramatic increase in virtual machine sales and reduced licensing costs has enabled PoundHost to increase profitability by 55 percent.

"We could use VMware tools to manage the virtual machines, but we wanted to offer server monitoring, backup and software-update services to increase our services and revenue," said Matthew Munson, group technical director, PoundHost Internet Ltd. and BlueSquare Data Group Services Ltd. "VMware didn't have a suite of tools to do these things. The Microsoft System Center products work with Hyper-V, so we could manage and provision servers much more easily than we could with VMware."

Crutchfield, based in Charlottesville, Va., is a leading consumer electronics retailer with a mail-order catalog and e-commerce Web site. The company's IT staff turned to virtualization to cut datacenter costs, improve IT staff productivity, and promote business agility. However, its VMware-based solution limited its server consolidation ratios, and a software upgrade would have cost $44,000. Instead, Crutchfield deployed a cost-effective solution using Windows Server 2008 with Hyper-V technology and the Microsoft System Center management suite. Today, Crutchfield has cut datacenter heating output by 50 percent and reduced physical servers by 30 percent. The IT staff uses Microsoft System Center to manage both physical and virtual servers, boosting IT staff productivity by 40 percent.

"We had so many reasons for building out our virtualization solution, but with the VMware-based platform we couldn't make any headway," said Craig Vanhuss, system administrator, Enterprise System Group at Crutchfield. "Since deploying Hyper-V, IT has shown a new level of agility and responsiveness. Thanks to our Microsoft virtualization solution, we are meeting the needs of the business while minimizing costs."

More information about how to begin cutting costs, including case studies on PoundHost and Crutchfield, can be found at http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization. Microsoft product and solution experts at VMworld 2009 can be followed via Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/virtualization or by monitoring the hash tag #MS_Virt.

Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is the worldwide leader in software, services and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.

SOURCE Microsoft Corp.

 Top of page

Virtualization has never been easier. Hyper-V is just another role in Windows Server 2008 (including R2). Once the role is installed, it's just point and click to setup, configure and get a Virtual Machine (VM) running. On top of that is the cost savings in comparison to other vendor products. Microsoft not only offers features that are directly comparable to VMware in their R2 release, they also go one step further and offer the ability to manage your physical and virtual infrastructure - this includes managing VMware virtual machines. This is done by the use of System Center Virtual Machine Manager. Free downloads are available from Hyper-V Server, or Windows Server 2008/R2 which includes Hyper-v.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

"Google Toolbar Fail"? #Google #Microsoft #Firefox

It’s as though Google doesn’t want you to use its new Chrome browser. If you try to install the Google Toolbar on Chrome, it practically suggests that you switch browsers. Chrome users are greeted with this message:

We’re sorry, but Google Toolbar 5 is only available for Internet Explorer and Firefox

Of course, Chrome is like a giant Google Toolbar that takes up the whole screen, so you don’t really need it. (The Toolbar offers Google search, bookmarks, search suggestions, Web history, and shortcuts to Google apps). But still that’s not the message Google wants to be sending to curious Chrome users.

Google Chrome image

Company: Google
Website: google.com/chrome
Launch Date: September 2, 2008

Google Chrome is an open source browser based on Webkit and powered by Google Gears. It was accidentally announced prematurely on September 1,… Learn More

Google Toolbar image

Company: Google
Website: toolbar.google.com

Google Toolbar is a browser extension offering integration with Google products and various enhances. Features include Bookmarking (that’s saved across browsers), suggestions for searches, and a ‘send-to’ button that will send webpages to friends… Learn More

Information provided by CrunchBase

I don't even know what comments to leave for this one...

I think "Google Toolbar Fail" says it all.

We all have our share of bad days, right?

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

The Net’s Deadliest Celebrities

The Net’s Deadliest Celebrities

August 25, 2009 by Casey | 0 comments

Jessica Biel

Apparently Jessica Biel could kill your computer. According to McAfee’s annual report on the riskiest celebs to search for, the 27-year-old actress’ name poses the biggest threat when it comes to viruses, spyware, and other online threats popping up in search results. Search terms like “Jessica Biel photos” and “Jessica Biel screensavers” have a 1 in 5 chance of landing you somewhere you don’t want to be. (Though on the other hand, you also have a 4 in 5 chance of landing on somewhere you do want to be, like naked photos from Powder Blue.)

Biel ousted Brad Pitt from the top position from last year; I wonder if this indicates a shifting demographic for spammers? Pitt is now at #10, and the rest rounding out that list…

  1. Jessica Biel
  2. Beyonce
  3. Jennifer Anniston
  4. Tom Brady
  5. Jessica Simpson
  6. Gisele Bundchen
  7. Miley Cyrus
  8. Megan Fox AND Angelina Jolie (I assume this is a tie rather than representing a dual search term, though I can see that, too…)
  9. Ashely Tisdale
  10. Brad Pitt

McAfee also noted that the Obamas are only in the bottom third of this year’s results.

Hmmmm.  I suppose now I have to go do a search for “Jessica Biel photos” to find one to accompany this post.  Batten down the hatches!

[Picture Source: Flickr (CC)]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg

  • StumbleUpon

  • Reddit

  • Facebook

  • MySpace

  • FriendFeed

  • del.icio.us

  • Google Bookmarks

Related Posts:
  1. Eminem’s Bizarre Star Trek Homage
  2. Free High-speed Sewer-net
  3. Monday Morning Humor: Internet celebrities do a battle to the death
  4. NET-2000 allows you to catch criminals just like Spiderman! (Video)
Cool posts on other blogs:

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

NHL files bid to buy Coyotes

Of course they did. If they don't, we all know Jim Balsillie will out-bid anyone else out there. If the guy wants to buy the team, let him. It's not like he'll be coaching them himself. He'll have the right people doing that for him... This is just BS if you ask me.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Don't understand Flowcharts? This should help!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Tech Support Cheat Sheet - Secrets of Troubleshooting

I only wish it was this easy at times...

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

RIM Kicking Apple's Ass - Jim's posterous

rimm_lazaridis_balsillie.03.jpg
Jim Balsillie, left, and Mike Lazaridis, co-CEOs of Research in Motion
chart_smartphones.gif
Game-changing ads

Research in Motion is courting consumers, and Apple is making inroads in the office. Here’s a simple quiz to determine your smartphone type.

(Fortune Magazine) -- For two Canadian guys who've spent the past 17 years together building one of the world's most important tech companies, Research in Motion co-CEOs Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis have surprisingly little in common.

Balsillie, 48, is tall, sinewy, and bald. He likes to spend his free time doing triathlons or jetting off to Europe to ride his bike up the Tour de France's toughest mountain climbs. Lazaridis, also 48, is stout and unathletic with a thick shock of white hair. He laments that by the time he could afford to drive a Porsche, his posterior was too big to fit in the seat.

The extroverted Balsillie (Ball-SILLY) is a freewheeling conversationalist who will talk your ear off about his quest to buy the Phoenix Coyotes hockey team and bring the NHL franchise to Canada. The reserved Lazaridis (Laz-a-REE-dis) would rather not discuss his personal life but admits that at age 12 he won a prize for reading every science book in the Windsor Public Library. Balsillie is the financial whiz who drives corporate strategy. Lazaridis is the engineering genius who spearheads product development for the BlackBerry maker.

The two don't socialize outside of work. Their offices in RIM's headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario, about an hour's drive southwest of Toronto, aren't even in the same building. But the lack of personal connection doesn't hinder their effectiveness. Quite the opposite, in fact. They say it just makes them more efficient. "We each know what we're good at," says Lazaridis. "We don't even have to ask."

Individually, Balsillie and Lazaridis may not be the equal of a certain black-mock-turtleneck-and-jeans-wearing consumer-product-design genius in Cupertino, Calif., who just happens to be their biggest rival. But together the pair is pretty darn formidable. Do two collaborative Canadians match up to one Steve Jobs? For the moment, at least, they're more than holding their own.

A crowded and competitive business

Despite the incredible success of Apple's iPhone, Research in Motion (RIMM) retains a dominant position in the ultra-fast-growing smartphone business -- the combo phone/e-mail device category that Balsillie and Lazaridis essentially created.

Over the past decade RIM has sold some 65 million phones to its now 28.5 million subscribers, increasing its stock market capitalization from $96 million to $42 billion in the process. (Balsillie and Lazaridis each have a 6% stake, good for roughly $2.5 billion apiece.)

RIM has a commanding 56% share of the $12 billion U.S. smartphone market. And its sales are still accelerating. In fact, according to industry tracker IDC, the bestselling smartphone in the U.S. so far this year by units is not the iPhone but the BlackBerry Curve.

Thanks to those booming sales, Research in Motion ranks No. 1 on Fortune's 2009 list of Fastest-Growing Companies, with a three-year average earnings-per-share growth of 84% and revenue growth of 77%. Even after last year's stock market meltdown, shares of RIM have a three-year annualized total return of 45%. Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500), which is three times the size of RIM in both sales and market value, checks in at No. 39.

Once considered mostly a business tool, of late the BlackBerry has made huge gains as a consumer product. RIM launched its first television ad campaign targeting a mass audience in 2008, and last quarter 80% of its new subscribers came from the nonbusiness crowd. Teens, for instance, love BlackBerry Messenger, RIM's proprietary instant messaging feature. Then there's the influence of a certain e-mailer-in-chief. "President Obama carrying a BlackBerry was a tremendously sexy marketing tool," says analyst Philip Cusick of Macquarie Research Equities. "It keeps my nephews thinking it's cool."

The good news for both RIM and Apple is that the overall smartphone market is growing faster than ever. In 2008 a total of 1.19 billion mobile phones were sold worldwide, according to IDC, of which some 155 million were smartphones, or 13%. In 2013, IDC predicts that 20% of the 1.4 billion phones sold will be smartphones, or 280 million.

The competition, though, is getting increasingly stiff. New entrants like computer manufacturers Acer and (if rumors are true) Dell (DELL, Fortune 500) are rushing into the market. A revitalized Palm (PALM) has taken aim at the iPhone with its Pre, which debuted on the Sprint network in June and will be available on Verizon next year. And Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) is pouring resources into its Android smartphone operating system and training its sights on the enterprise portion of the market that Research in Motion currently dominates. Motorola (MOT, Fortune 500) is poised to debut two new devices running Android this fall.

"There are going to be more smartphone launches in the next couple of months than we've ever seen before," says Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney.

While BlackBerry is making inroads with consumers, the iPhone is winning over an increasing share of business customers. According to ChangeWave Research, as of May Apple had 20% of the enterprise market, up from 6% just a year ago. (Much of the gain came at the expense of Palm's Treo.) Over the same period RIM's share dipped slightly from 76% to 74%.

Apple also makes more on each sale. According to Sanford Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, Apple currently has an operating margin of 40% on its iPhones vs. RIM's average per handset of 20.7%. (The industry mean is 9.7%.)

Keeping up with changing demands

Another challenge is that the consumer's expectations about what smartphones should provide are also evolving rapidly. Mobile phone users increasingly want to access the web more than they want to make calls. They're gravitating toward Tweeting rather than long e-mails. And they want applications, those programs that let you check the weather, play games, and even balance your checkbook. Apple now boasts some 65,000 choices in its App Store that range from the über-practical to the ultra-absurd. The new BlackBerry app store, by contrast, which launched only in April, offers just 2,000.

Whereas RIM led the mobile-phone industry into e-mail, it is a follower in the race to build a dominant software ecosystem for handheld computing. "The Apple model will be one portion of the community, and Android will be another," says Cusick of Macquarie Research. "It will be tough for RIM to remain competitive."

But if RIM's co-CEOs are daunted by this changing environment, neither is showing it. While artfully dodging direct questions about Apple, they come across as defiantly confident. The pair seem more concerned about managing the company's explosive growth than about its coming to an end. "Sometimes we have to put the brakes on," says Lazaridis matter-of-factly. "We've shown that we can handle annual 100% growth. I'm not sure we could handle more than that."

How RIM foresaw the smartphone

Look south from Lazaridis's second-floor office window, and you'll see a cluster of new buildings that have crept down a slope in recent years to nudge right up against the edge of the University of Waterloo, a math and engineering school the caliber of MIT. On the other side of the campus is the horse-and-buggy Mennonite community of St. Jacobs.

In a typical year, 2,000 Waterloo students are spending their "co-op" semester of work placement as RIM employees. They serve as a much-needed supplement to Research in Motion's ballooning operations. Last year alone the company grew 50% in headcount to 12,000 employees. RIM has easily supplanted once-mighty Nortel as Canada's flagship tech company.

Lazaridis dropped out of Waterloo in 1984, just one month shy of graduation, to start Research in Motion as a computer science consulting business with his childhood friend Doug Fregin. (A behind-the-scenes guy, Fregin served as vice president of operations until he retired in 2007.) The two biked daily to their first office, a 500-square-foot space above a bagel store in a strip mall. One early application they created enabled businesses to conduct credit card transactions. In the late 1980s they helped develop technology that made for faster direct-to-video movies (making RIM indirectly responsible for the Olsen twins' fame and fortune).

Then they had the insight that would eventually make them billions. Watching Waterloo students eagerly embrace e-mail, they realized it would be the communication medium of the future and would eventually move to devices much like phones. A company that could provide those products would have an enormous opportunity. "We knew e-mail was going to be the foundation of business, that it'd replace fax," said Lazaridis. "We basically had to wait around and get ready." Unfortunately, they had nearly run out of money.

So in 1992, Lazaridis and Fregin turned to Jim Balsillie, a management consultant they had previously worked with on a failed project. Balsillie, a onetime college roommate of author Malcolm Gladwell ("The Tipping Point") at the University of Toronto's Trinity College, invested $125,000 for a one-third stake in the business. He took the co-CEO title and threw himself into fundraising. In 1997, RIM went public with a listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange and raised $115 million from investors. Two years later the company introduced its first BlackBerry brand e-mail device, a bulky rectangle with a narrow screen that ran off one AA battery.

Balsillie took an unconventional approach to winning the company's first customers that proved highly successful. He sank his energy into investor relations, crisscrossing the U.S. to sit down with analysts and bankers.

"Every time I'd go up there and present, I'd sit there and ask, 'Who here uses Microsoft Exchange?'" he remembers. "And two-thirds would raise their hands. Then I'd say, 'Who here would like to get e-mail on their belt for free?'" He collected business cards and sent "e-mail evangelists" -- kids just out of college -- back to get the bankers up and running. Within a year the BlackBerry had become a staple on Wall Street. "It was a puppy dog sale," he says. "'Take a puppy dog home, and if you don't like it, bring it back.' They never come back."

BlackBerry's growth strategy

Most people think of Apple as RIM's biggest threat. While that may be true, there is probably no single event that has done more for RIM's business than the iPhone launch. It was Apple that convinced consumers that they could enjoy the ease and power of a desktop in a handheld device, thus opening a vast new market. Overnight the smartphone became, by popular demand, a consumer device. Since the iPhone's introduction in June 2007, BlackBerry quarterly sales have more than tripled, from $1.1 billion to $3.4 billion. Three of the five top-selling mobile phones in the U.S. are now BlackBerrys.

While Apple has chosen to develop one phone on its own through one carrier (AT&T (T, Fortune 500)) and wait for customers to seek it out, RIM has pursued the opposite strategy -- what Balsillie calls "constructive engagement." Rather than creating devices independently, RIM partners with carriers to make individualized products. It produces numerous versions of its seven basic handsets. And because RIM works with every major carrier, consumers are able to buy a subsidized BlackBerry no matter what their plan.

This approach has paid great dividends. For instance, when Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500) needed a strong competitor for the iPhone it sought out RIM to develop the Storm, which introduced a sensory touchscreen keypad. Verizon provided a generous subsidy for the device and put a multimillion-dollar marketing campaign behind it. Though early reviews were mixed, the Storm has become the third-best-selling smartphone since its debut last year.

RIM believes one way to continue growing in the crowded U.S. market is to develop targeted products for specific groups of customers. On July 27, for example, RIM announced the Curve 8520, a new BlackBerry aimed at social media maniacs (read: tweens) with buttons that allow users to upload media directly to YouTube and Facebook. It went on sale this month at Wal-Mart for just $48.88 with a two-year T-Mobile contract.

Balsillie and Lazaridis, however, think that their biggest growth opportunity may lie outside the U.S. Foreign consumers are only beginning to embrace smartphones in large numbers. And Finnish phone giant Nokia (NOK), long the global powerhouse, has been losing share rapidly.

So RIM has begun positioning itself in foreign markets, forming partnerships with 475 carriers in 160 countries in recent years. "The thought that Latin America and Western Europe could someday be like North America in terms of market penetration gets us very, very excited," says Balsillie.

But the act of going global alone won't be enough for RIM to succeed in the long run. Just as it once made e-mail in a phone into its Killer App, the company must adapt to a world with thousands of killer apps. "What you carry on your belt is now your MP3 player, will be your plasma TV, is your social-networking machine, is your Internet terminal, your camera, your personal navigation device," says Balsillie.

Apps, apps, and more apps

More and more, phones are becoming devices for users to download the software programs, or applications, they want. (As Apple's TV commercials promise: "There's an app for that!") No single company can come up with the massive portfolio of applications that will please consumers, however. That would be like asking Wal-Mart to make all the products it also sells.

And that's why smartphone makers are trying so hard to woo software developers to make the programs that will run on their phones. The market for this software is relatively small now, but it's growing quickly. Juniper Research estimates sales of mobile applications could hit $25 billion in 2014, up from $7 billion last year.

RIM has long had one of the largest enterprise developer communities, but more recently it has worked aggressively to court a wider group by doing what it does best: partnering with them. That challenge falls to RIM's vice president of business, marketing, and alliances, Jeff McDowell. Though his division brings in only a tiny portion of the company's revenues, Balsillie and Lazaridis shower him with attention. "I talk to Mike at least once a day, and Jim usually four times," says McDowell. "I can show up at Jim's office anytime he's in and he'll see me."

McDowell oversees the BlackBerry Alliance Program, which offers its 1,700 partners dedicated teams of RIM developers, technical expertise, and marketing support. Last fall the company held its first developer conference in Silicon Valley, a packed event in which it gave developers insight into plans for new products as well as one-on-one instruction and a chance to hobnob with the company's most prestigious engineers.

And in April the company launched BlackBerry App World, a virtual storefront that collects most BlackBerry applications in one central location. Developers keep 80% of what they charge for their programs. (Apple offers developers 70%.) "Our objective is to help developers make money," explains McDowell. "That creates the buzz, and then I don't have to worry about the benefits to RIM."

Ultimately, though, Balsillie and Lazaridis know they'll need more than buzz. The challenge is to anticipate the fickle tastes of a new consumer market. And in their own pragmatic way, they're confident that they're up for the task. "We don't just throw spaghetti at the wall and see what works," says Lazaridis, a touch defensively. "We have a lot of faith in our own capabilities, and we do a lot of research into what people want and don't want. Our products just keep getting better and better and better." With the iPhone as a competitor, they need to be.

Reporter associates: Kim Thai and Alyssa Abkowitz To top of page

This is an article that will make Blackberry users smile. RIM is kicking Apple's ass despite the fact that Apple gets all the hype. Heck, even my kids would never trade their BB's for an iPhone ("it's a toy" is a direct quote). RIM ranks #1 in Fortune's 2009 Fastest Growing Companies list - Apple is #39. Three year total return for RIM (what market meltdown?): 45%. Best selling smartphone in the US?: Blackberry Curve. RIM total market share of US smartphone market 56%!! Thinking of developing a cool mobile app? Thinking Apple? WAKE UP!! Build it for the Blackberry.

Jim sums up this long article in just a few words on his blog post.

Here are my two cents:

Since 2007, Apple went from 3% Market share to 11 - Rim in the same time frame went from 10 to 20%. A close race indeed.
Jim you're kids are right, the iPhone is a toy. I feel the same about it.

One thing we need to look at is the launch strategy. Rim started by targeting the business sector, where as Apple aimed at the consumer. It seems now they're crossing over with the functionality and features offered.

It'll be interesting to see what's going to be next for Apple. Rim has a device with a QWERTY keyboard (for people like me that can't stand touch screens), and they've got a touch screen for those who hate the keyboard. Apple on the other hand only has the touch screen (part of the reason I don't even care to look at it).

It'll be interesting to see how this battle unfolds in the months & years to come.

T.J.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Thursday, August 20, 2009

I just drove through this storm... not fun!!!


I spotted this on my way home.  It seemed a lot further north then where I was, but eventually went right over me.  Zero visibility, 
and lightning flashes were seen every few seconds.  The craziest storm I have ever been through in my life.

See and download the full gallery on posterous

Posted via email from T.J. Walia's posterous

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Hackers Break Into Police Computers. Officers didn't set a password!

Exclusive: An Australian Federal Police boast, on the ABC's Four Corners program, about officers breaking up an underground hacker forum, has backfired after hackers broke into a federal police computer system.

Security consultants say police appear to have been using the computer as a honeypot to collect information on members of the forum but the scheme came undone after the officers forgot to set a password.

Last Wednesday, federal police officers in co-operation with Victoria Police executed a search warrant on premises in Brighton, Melbourne, connected to the administrator of an underground hacking forum, r00t-y0u.org, which had about 5000 members.

Many details of the investigation were revealed for the first time on Four Corners last night.

After the raid, the federal police covertly assumed control of the forum and began using it to gather evidence about members.

"We can operate in a covert activity here fairly seamlessly with no harm to our members with continual and actual significant penetration," Neil Gaughan, national manager of the federal police's High Tech Crimes Operation, told Four Corners.

However, what the federal police did not know was that hackers had already cottoned on to their plan.

Police were monitoring the forum by logging into the account of the administrator they had raided, but this aroused suspicion among members who knew the raid had taken place.

A hacker broke into the federal police's computer system and, according to a source close to the investigation, accessed both police evidence and intelligence about federal police systems such as its IP addresses.

A spokeswoman for the federal police confirmed that the hacker broke into a computer system used in its investigation but denied that any evidence was compromised, saying the computer was not connected to other federal police systems.

"The AFP has identified a person whom [sic] has attempted to access the stand-alone computer system and we are currently working with our law enforcement partners regarding this matter," the spokeswoman said.

The hacker appears to have been provoked by a message published on the r00t-y0u.org site by the federal police, warning members they were under surveillance and that "all member IP addresses have been logged", with some arrests having already been made.

In two provocative messages published on anonymous document-sharing site pastebin.com, the hacker slammed the federal police for "making it sound like they can bust 'hackers', when all they have done is busted a COUPLE script kiddies". "Script kiddies" is hacker parlance for novice hackers.

The second of these messages contained several links to screenshots allegedly proving that the writer had access to the federal police's server.

These included shots of files containing fake IDs and stolen credit card numbers, as well as the federal police's server information.

The hacker then defaced the r00t-y0u.org website with the same message it had posted on the anonymous document-sharing site.

The federal police spokeswoman said: "The information posted on the http://pastebin.com website is information contained on a stand-alone [federal police] system designed specifically to be used in investigations such as this.

"The information consists of directory file names of previously compromised credentials. No information or files exist that have, or could have, been compromised."

The hacker wrote "I couldn't stop laughing" on seeing that the federal police's server was running Windows, which is known among hacker communities for being insecure. Police had also "left the MYSQL password blank".

"These dipshits are using an automatic digital forensics and incident response tool," the hacker wrote.

"All of this [hacking] had been done within 30-40 minutes. Could of been faster if I didn't stop to laugh so much."

Shaon Diwakar, a security consultant at Hack Labs in Sydney, explained how the hack occurred.

"The attacker has discovered that the server didn't have a password for its database application and he has logged on ... and, using a technique called SQL injection, he created a PHP file on the disk and browsed through that PHP file to get complete control of that particular server," he said.

Diwakar said the hacker would have had access to anything that was stored on the computer.

"When they took this action they should have known that they would have been a big target, so they should have taken more precautions," he said.

The federal police said it had yet to charge anyone over the r00t-y0u.org forum bust, but "numerous items" were seized and the investigation was ongoing.

It declined to comment further on the case.

What do you expect when officers forget to set a password??? You're dealing with hackers, not grade 1 kids!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Build Your Own iPhone App in 5 Minutes - thanks @mashable

Can it get any simpler?

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Neglected dog 'worst ever seen' - This is really sad folks, please read.

I can't believe how cruel people can be. I hope the person who did this is put behind bars for a long time. I wish I could give that person a piece of my mind!!! I'm a dog owner, and don't understand how people could do this??? I don't even have words to express my frustration!!!
This is really sad.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Monday, August 17, 2009

Man builds toothpick city - thanks @charlesyeo

Not only does this require talent, but a lot of patience too. 34 Years to be exact. Incredible!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

@BarackObama the new Hero? Barack takes on Darth Vader!!!

The Obama Doll!!! I wish I could translate the text on the site to see what it is they're saying. It seems like this Obama Action figure is the new Hero in town taking on Darth Vader. It seems like you can dress him up, remove his jacket & tie for "casual Fridays", or make him a Ninja. Wonder if it'll be in stores, or if it's just a one-off??

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Video gets over 3 Million hits!!! How to be Gangster?

I must admit, it is entertaining...

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

SEARCH SHOWDOWN: Microsoft’s Plan to Win the Search War

To Bing or not to Bing!

I've been using bing for over 3 weeks now, and it's really a tossup between the two. I've noticed searching for specific files in Bing is a lot more useful then Google. In bing if you use the "Contains:" attribute, you can place a file type extension after the colon, and that will narrow your search to that specific filetype. Yes, Google too can do this ("filetype:" parameter), but what Google does is it searches directly for that file, whereas Bing will find a page with that file name being specified. Huge difference here because results will be different, and I've found bing to be more effective here.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Saturday, August 15, 2009

iPhone 3GS for $99??

iPhone(Credit: CNET)

The latest Apple rumor is that the iPhone 3G will soon be replaced by a low-priced 8GB iPhone 3GS. Apparently, Rogers Wireless in Canada sent out a memo that implies the $99 iPhone 3G pricing announced at WWDC earlier this summer was to get rid of inventory to make way for the faster 3GS. Though nobody knows what the price might be on the new iPhone (or even if this rumor is true), it would be exciting to see a smaller 3GS for those who don't need all the space. While we wait to see what the next thing out of Apple might be, let's check out this week's apps.

This week's apps are both games including a recently discovered word game and a tower defense game in which you'll defend planets from invading aliens.

BookWorm

Added challenges like burning tiles and bonus books make this game highly addictive.

(Credit: CNET)

Bookworm ($2.99), by Popcap Games, is a word game in which you tap the screen to select adjacent letter tiles to make words. A cartoon drawn bookworm sits on top of the gameplay area and the idea is that as you complete words you are feeding the hungry bookworm while also getting points. You can play the game in Classic mode (no timer) or a timed version to add to the challenge. I've reviewed a similar game before called WordsWorth, but Bookworm has some unique features that definitely make it worth checking out.

What makes Bookworm especially fun are the added challenges you need to contend with as you make words. Flaming tiles will appear that slowly burn downward through your stack of letters if you don't use them quickly. If a flaming tile reaches the bottom, your library burns and the game ends. My favorite feature is the special collections--when you select certain words like "Red," for example, the game pauses briefly to show you a list of color names that give added bonuses as you cross them off the list. There are several categories of special collections and the effect is that you start to search for words that will complete your categories. On the start-up screen you can view your bonus book list to see which categories your working on and view stats for your overall gameplay. Anyone who likes word games will like the basic play of Bookworm, but the added features and challenges make this game worth the money.

Star Defense

Make sure to upgrade your towers as you go or you won't stand a chance

(Credit: CNET)

Star Defense ($1.99) from Ngmoco (makers of Rolando) is a tower defense type of game where you're job is to defend planets from an alien onslaught. The graphics are great for an iPhone game and the sounds and music add to the feeling of battling an endless alien invasion. Like other tower defense games, you have several gun towers to choose from, with some of them better at taking out certain types of enemies. You'll quickly realize that a good mix of towers is the best strategy, but as you try harder levels, you'll also have to manage the money you get from kills and upgrade your towers to make them more effective. Like other tower defense games, you'll need to beat a certain number of waves of enemies to complete a level.

What sets Star Defense apart from other tower defense games is the interface and level design. Your available towers are on the right side of the screen, making it easy to drag and drop them into position. The planets are in full 3D, so you'll need to swipe your finger to rotate the planet to get to where the action is. Not being able to see the entire path at one time adds an extra element to the gameplay because sometimes you'll find yourself rotating the planet frantically, trying to place towers that will kill escaped enemies. To make it more challenging, the paths travel around each planet in different ways, so you'll need to consider the best placement for each tower. Overall, Star Defense is an excellent addition to the tower defense genre, with enough of a variation on gameplay to make it worthy of your download.

What's your favorite iPhone app? Do you have a word game on your iPhone that's better than Bookworm? What's your secret for playing the harder difficulty levels in Star Defense? Let me know in the comments!

The iPhone 3G is is sold out at every cell phone provider across the nation, what will happen with a $99 iPhone 3GS? Apple better make enough of these units to meet demands.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Digital Home - North Americans pay some of the highest mobile phone rates

North Americans pay some of the highest mobile phone ratesA recent OECD report which compared the price of mobile phone service among OECD countries has concluded that consumers in Canada, Spain and the United States paid some of the highest mobile phone rates in the world.

The lowest rates were found in Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden.

 

To compare prices across the thirty OECD countries, the report calculated and compared wireless phone rates for low, medium and high usage consumers.

The OECD Communications Outlook says between 2006 and 2008 mobile phone call prices fell on average by 21% for low usage consumers, 28% for medium usage and by 32% for subscribers with the highest consumption patterns.

In comparing 30 countries, Canada ranked 20th among light users, 28th among medium users and 19th among heavy users. The United States ranked 30th, 30th and 25th respectively. Spain ranked 29th, 29th and 30th respectively.

The following is a brief overview of the results.

Low Usage

Comparing prices on a medium-use basis for a package of 360 voice calls, 396 short texts (SMS), and eight multimedia (MMS) messages, the survey found monthly prices ranged from $4.5 to $24 US dollars across countries as of August 2008. The OECD average was $163 annually or about $13.50 per month.

In the low use category Canadians ranked 20th at just over $16 a month while the Americans ranked last with expenditures of $23 a month. The OECD estimates the low usage Canadian spent $195 a year vs. $279 for an American. Light users in Denmark spent the least, $4.50 per month.

Medium Usage

Comparing prices on a medium-use basis for a package of 780 voice calls, 600 short texts (SMS), and eight multimedia (MMS) messages, the survey found monthly prices ranged from $11 to $53 US dollars across countries as of August 2008. The OECD average was $317 annually or about $26.50 per month.

In the medium use category, Canadians spent $42 a month and ranked 28th while the Americans ranked last with monthly expenses of $53. The OECD estimates the medium usage Canadian spent $563 a year vs. $635 for an American. Medium users in Denmark spent the least, $11 per month.

High Usage

Comparing prices on a high-use basis for a package of 1680 voice calls, 600 short texts (SMS), and 12 multimedia (MMS) messages, the survey found monthly prices ranged from $15 to $80 US  across countries as of August 2008.  The OECD average was $489 annually or about $40.75 per month.

In the high use category, Canadians spent $47 a month and ranked 19th while the Americans ranked 25th with monthly expenditures of $53. The OECD estimates the high usage Canadian spent $563 a year vs. $635 for an American. Heavy users in Denmark spent the least, $15 per month.

 

Discuss and learn more

Discuss this story in our Canadian Mobile Phone forum in the Digital Forum. Membership in the Digital Forum is free and with more than 750,000 visitors a month, there is always something new and interesting to discuss.

 

 

I couldn't agree any more... I pay extra just to get free incoming calls on my Rogers phone. When I traveled to India almost 2 years ago, they had free incoming (even on pay-as-you-go plans). This is just a ripoff!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Friday, August 14, 2009

RIM planning a BlackBerry watch?

I just traded my touch screen phone in for a QWERTY... Imagine dialing on a watch :s

Don't see it as a hot seller (if it comes out)...

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Biggest US bank failure this year

Ouch!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

The Tabla Guy

This guy is out of this world!!!

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Does Porsche + Volkswagen deal = a boxter on Diesel???

Alert Email Print Share #var paragraph = content as Paragraph; #var textChunk = chunk as TextChunk; #// #// -->

By Simon Kennedy, MarketWatch

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Shares in Germany's Porsche SE surged over 10% Friday after Volkswagen agreed to buy a 42% stake in its core sports car business as the precursor to a full merger in 2011.

Volkswagen /quotes/comstock/11e!fvow (DE:VOW 211.92, -16.07, -7.05%) said it will pay up to 3.3 billion euros for the stake by the end of the year and will issue new preferred shares sometime in the first half of 2010 to finance the acquisition.

/quotes/comstock/11e!fpah3 PAH3 49.61, +4.91, +10.98%
/quotes/comstock/11e!fvow VOW 211.92, -16.07, -7.05%
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
-60%
09
F
M
A
M
J
J
A

The deal will create an automotive giant with ten major brands -- including Volkswagen, Porsche, Audi and Skoda -- annual sales of around 6.4 million vehicles and over 400,000 employees.

The deal follows a failed attempt by Porsche /quotes/comstock/11e!fpah3 (DE:PAH3 49.61, +4.91, +10.98%) to take over its bigger rival. Porsche amassed over 10 billion euros of debt after building a roughly 50% stake in Volkswagen and acquiring options on around another 20%.

But it was unable to sustain the high levels of debt and was eventually forced to seek help from Volkswagen.

Shares in Porsche jumped 10.7% in early trading Friday, while Volkswagen dropped 3.5%.

Porsche is negotiating to sell its remaining options on Volkswagen to investors in Qatar.

Volkswagen said Friday that the planned deal is conditional on the successful sale of those options, which would make Qatar the group's third biggest shareholder.

"Additional new growth opportunities will emerge for Porsche under the umbrella of the integrated group," said Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn in a statement.

"Following constructive talks, we have agreed a solution that reflects the interests of all parties. I am convinced that the outcome of this integration will be the best vehicles for our customers, secure jobs and the creation of long-term value for our shareholder," he added.

Porsche said late Thursday that Winterkorn will become its CEO with effect from Sept. 15 and that Volkswagen Chief Financial Officer Hans Dieter Poetsch will take over the top finance role at Porsche on the same date.

The sports care group's former CEO Wendelin Wiedeking and finance chief Holger Haerter both stepped down late last month.

Simon Kennedy is the City correspondent for MarketWatch in London.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Super lottery fever grips Italy (138.9 Million Euros???)

Now that's a lottery system. Getting frees flight just to go buy a 1 Euro ticket? Where do I sign up?

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Stock index futures signal flat start for Wall St. - MarketWatch

Alert Email Print Share #var paragraph = content as Paragraph; #var textChunk = chunk as TextChunk; #// #// -->

By William L. Watts, MarketWatch

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stock index futures were slightly lower in choppy trade Friday, pointing to a flat to lower opening for Wall Street as investors await data on July consumer price inflation and industrial production.

S&P 500 index futures were down 1.5 points at 1,012, while Nasdaq 100 futures slipped 4 points to 1,627.75. Dow Jones Industrial futures were off 12 points.

The consumer price index, set for release at 8:30 a.m. Eastern, is expected to have remained flat in July, according to a survey of economists by MarketWatch. Core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, is forecast to show a 0.1% rise.

July industrial production data, due at 9:15 a.m. Eastern, is expected to show a 0.7% rise after a 0.4% fall in June, the survey found.

U.S. stock indexes posted a second day of gains Thursday, shaking off weakness in the consumer sector after a disappointing fall in July retail sales underlined expectations that consumers aren't willing or able to boost spending.

A growing appetite for risk, which has helped buoy shares around the world, remains the dominant theme in the market, despite the retail data, wrote strategists at Lloyds TSB, in a note to clients.

But caution remains the watchword, they said, noting that the weak retail data underlined the U.S. Federal Reserve's observation Wednesday that consumer spending is struggling to gain traction amid rising unemployment and a the readjustment of household balance sheets.

"So while the upbeat sentiment in risk assets is encouraging, there is an argument that some markets could be living on borrowed time," the strategists wrote.

On the earnings front, clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch Co. /quotes/comstock/13*!anf/quotes/nls/anf (ANF 32.96, +0.88, +2.74%) is expected to post a second-quarter loss of 7 cents a share, according to analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters.

Department-store retailer J.C. Penney Co. /quotes/comstock/13*!jcp/quotes/nls/jcp (JCP 33.34, +0.13, +0.39%) is forecast to post a second quarter loss of 1 cent a share.

European shares gained ground Friday. See Europe Markets.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average /quotes/comstock/10w!i:dji/delayed (INDU 9,398, +36.58, +0.39%) closed at 9,398.19 Thursday, a 0.4% gain. The S&P 500 Index /quotes/comstock/21z!i1:in\x (SPX 1,013, +6.92, +0.69%) finished at its highest level since October, gaining 6.92 points, or 0.7%, to 1,012.73. The technology-led Nasdaq Composite /quotes/comstock/10y!i:comp (COMP 2,009, +10.63, +0.53%) advanced 10.63 points, or 0.5%, to settle at 2,009.35.

Oil futures were up 25 cents a barrel at $70.77 in electronic trade on Nymex.

The dollar slipped 0.3% versus the Japanese currency to 95.06 yen. The euro was little changed versus the greenback at $1.4275.

William L. Watts is a reporter for MarketWatch in London.

Where's the super computer when you need it?

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Our Supercomputer Loves These Stocks - Motley Fool

By David Gardner
updated 3:00 a.m. ET, Thurs., Aug 13, 2009

When former World Chess Champion Garry Kasparov lost to IBM's Deep Blue chess computer more than a decade ago, we at The Motley Fool had our own particular insight into what had just happened.

And even better, the insight -- translated into action -- has led us to pick numerous winning stocks in the years since. Below, I'm going to share with you five stocks our supercomputer predicts will beat the market going forward, and two that will not.

Can a supercomputer make you rich by predicting the best stocks?
I think a better use would be to foresee the next General Motors and prevent that from happening.

Posted via web from T.J. Walia's posterous

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

 
 
Custom Search